SUBJ...CT:
CONFIDENTIAL.
ANTI-PIRACY MEASURES - CHINA COAST.
FROM
THE COMMANDER-IN-CHILF, CHINA STATION,
H.M.S."Kent" at Hongkong.
DATE
TO
29th November 1929.
No. 1791/01034.
.TEL SLCRETARY OF THE ADIRAI TY.
186
In accordance with Admiralty telegram dated the 1st
November 1929, No. 941, the following documents relative to the
prevention of piraoy in Chinese waters are submitted:-
1.
2m
Composition and Terms of Reference of Anti-Piracy Committee at Hongkong,
Report of Anti-Piracy Committee dated 30 th Oo to be r 1929, Fo. H.E.0260,
3.
Joint Letter from five shipping companies dated 30th August 1929,
4.
Copies of letters, etc., received individually from shipping companies,
5.
6.
7.
2.
Detailed report on the piracy of the ɛ.s."Deli Taru",
*
xtreet from South China Morning Post".
Anti-Piracy Guards (Indian).
I particularly wish to draw Their Lordships' attention
to the report of the Anti-Piracy Committee of 30th October, 1929,
which very clearly and ably sums up the whole situation, and with
which I am in complete agreement.
Although the report covers
the whole ground, I wish to add some remarks on the difficult
situation and put before Their Lordships my own personal views.
3. It has to be noted that at every epportunity the
shipping compares continue to put forward the claim that the
internal protection of their ships against piracy is a responsibil-
ity of the Government, and they follow it up with the natural
Gorollary of that claim for an extended supply of armed guards
instead of the proposed abolition. It is obvious that if that
responsibility were accepted by the Government a very large
increase in the number of guards would be necessary, as not only
would the demands of certain companies that all instead of only
some
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.